TUCSON, AZ – In a chilling phone call from behind bars, Ricky Wasenar, a man notorious for his role in one of the longest prison standoffs in U.S. history, has confessed to a series of inmate killings within the Arizona State Prison Complex. Wasenar, who previously made headlines for a violent two-week standoff at Lewis Prison in 2004, has now admitted to the murders of three fellow inmates in April, claiming he felt justified in his actions.
Wasenar’s recent call has reignited public interest in his case, as he openly expressed no remorse for the killings. He stated that his victims, who were convicted of sex crimes, deserved their fate and that he was merely serving justice on behalf of their victims. Wasenar’s chilling admission of planning to kill more inmates has raised serious concerns about prison safety and inmate management.
The murders occurred at a Tucson prison complex, where Wasenar claims to have taken advantage of the facility’s layout during meal times when inmates are confined to outdoor cages. He described the environment as a perfect trap, where his targets had nowhere to escape. This calculated approach underscores the premeditated nature of his actions.
Among the slain inmates was Al Perez, who Wasenar accused of heinous crimes, including the rape and murder of a young girl. Wasenar referred to his actions as a favor to society, eliminating what he called “maggots” from the world. The other two victims, identified as Harnage and Presley, were also serving sentences for sex offenses.
Wasenar’s violent history extends beyond his recent crimes. In November 2023, he was assigned a new cellmate, Joseph Desisto, who was also convicted of child molestation. Wasenar admitted to killing Desisto, describing the act as practice for future killings. However, the Pima County Medical Examiner ruled Desisto’s death as due to natural causes, raising questions about the thoroughness of the investigation.
Despite Wasenar’s brazen confessions, prison authorities have faced criticism for their handling of the situation. Wasenar claims that he warned prison staff about his intentions, yet no preventive measures were taken. His remarks suggest a sense of impunity, as he believes the rules inside prison walls differ from societal laws.
The ongoing investigation into Wasenar’s actions has sparked debate over the responsibilities of the Department of Corrections and whether systemic failures allowed these incidents to occur. As the story unfolds, the focus remains on understanding how such a dangerous individual could operate with apparent freedom to continue his violent spree.
Wasenar’s justification for his actions lies in his belief that he is delivering closure to victims’ families and deterring potential offenders. However, his cold demeanor and lack of remorse highlight the complex moral and ethical questions surrounding vigilante justice within the prison system. As authorities continue their probe, the public remains divided over whether Wasenar is a monster or a twisted form of justice.